I think the first idea about hildren staying with parents and or family is key. I would like to seemore support for this, not programs that seperate the young child even for a greater education opportunity. They need more nurturing and security at this age. ECFE programs keep parent and child together. WIC nutrition program supplements income for food for lower income families. Teaching parents how to spend time with their kids as they grow is important. Some parents need to read to their kids instead of watching TV all the time. They need to play games and go outside. They also need ideas for teaching them to do chores and to respect authority and be responsible for little things around the house.
While all options presented offered great ideas about how to utilize funds better in order to create the best forms of child care, the options did seem to be skewed. They present only the very best, "big idea" pictures without providing necessary information such as funding and real-world execution.
Although an answer, it most assuredly, is not the best one. Think, if you will, about the time spent learning as opposed to the time that they are "left behind". Studies have shown that knowledge is something that can be earned if enough time has been spent on it. It's not about them starting early, but about the amount of effort that they inevitably put in in the long run.
Absolutely. The amount of effort put in on occasion does add up more to what we started with. Just like all those child prodogies out there are mostly nothing more than skilled children who practice excessively (not saying it's a bad thing; I actually approve entirely--so long as they are willing and not stressed out by it).
I think all of the proposals have merit. if children are the source for future sucess of our society they must be nurtured as best we can based upon available knowledge However, since the family is the basis of our society family values must be taken into account; not some collective ideas. I like the given and take of this exhibit but wish there was a way of interchange with other past views.
Even though this is very important, it isn't the most IMPORTANT thing we need to focus on. I'm sure there are poeple that would disagree with me! But I think this should be brought up after we get outof national debt, gettng our soldiers home, anything else but this
Stay home with your babies! Only have one car. Stay married. Drop the cell phone plan. Drop cable. Raising children on 1 income is affordable, but sacrafices must be made. Don't have children if YOU don't intend to care for them.
the proposals have ups and down to each situation, pros and cons, bad and good thoughts. i guess its just some thing for voting and personal choices. actually strike that, voting stinks for the population most of the time, just a personal decision
The idea that parents are the most important resource in a child's 1st five years of development will hopefully lead more parents to not be ashamed to stay home and raise their own children rather than commit this important task to day care and pre-school providers!
why do people post things like "i agree" or "i disagree"... its obvious u think that by how u answered the survey the point posting things is to elaborate on ur opinion not just restating it.. just saying...
This entire show describes families incapable and under-educated to the task of raising children. It espouses the solution of more state power and moneys to be brought into play. We are all well familiar with this model. Higher taxes, less personal freedom and power over one's own life. Will we ever let go of this teary sentiment for failed socialist programs. Wake up, put the pipe down, (or whatever hypnotic you are ingesting).
The firs proposal suggests that parents being the first teachers and community organizations and government agencies taking an interest in their lives are mutually exclusive, or at least conflicting notions. I disagree...
i think most of the suggested contribution are very good to help all families and advocates for childrens health. however there may be more ideas out there to tap into.
My grandson attends a preschool where he is taught by attentive and knowledgeable teachers. I am always learning someting from them about childhood behavior and development. Why not combine the 3 scenarios so that knowledge like this can be regularly shared between family and community?
How lovely to have something so interactive; very valuable. I write as a married mother of two and someone whose brain was possibly affected in a car accident 21 years ago. I really agree with what you are aiming to do.
As a socity we strugle with this issue. The polics are thick and the children suffer. I agree it starts with the parents and if other pre-school programs were affordable that would help aid parents.
its a good idea and really easy
since im a cat i dont realy know that stuff . I guess i shouldnt of taken the quiz!
I think that the parents should worry about thier kids and not institutions.
These are great ideas except the last one. I didn't agree with that at all!
i think childcare is very impotant to our society. yeah! go children!!!! (:
I think the first idea about hildren staying with parents and or family is key. I would like to seemore support for this, not programs that seperate the young child even for a greater education opportunity. They need more nurturing and security at this age. ECFE programs keep parent and child together. WIC nutrition program supplements income for food for lower income families. Teaching parents how to spend time with their kids as they grow is important. Some parents need to read to their kids instead of watching TV all the time. They need to play games and go outside. They also need ideas for teaching them to do chores and to respect authority and be responsible for little things around the house.
While all options presented offered great ideas about how to utilize funds better in order to create the best forms of child care, the options did seem to be skewed. They present only the very best, "big idea" pictures without providing necessary information such as funding and real-world execution.
i did not agree
i think they did a horrible job
i agree with some,not all,but anything to mark our kids better,i will love it.
As the saying goes it takes a village to raise a chiild and as a mother of five i bellieve this saying is true
i learn to see the kids from birth to two years old now they are adored so much they learn fast !
i think that children are left behind at an early, eduation need to start earlier.
Although an answer, it most assuredly, is not the best one. Think, if you will, about the time spent learning as opposed to the time that they are "left behind". Studies have shown that knowledge is something that can be earned if enough time has been spent on it. It's not about them starting early, but about the amount of effort that they inevitably put in in the long run.
Absolutely. The amount of effort put in on occasion does add up more to what we started with. Just like all those child prodogies out there are mostly nothing more than skilled children who practice excessively (not saying it's a bad thing; I actually approve entirely--so long as they are willing and not stressed out by it).
I think all of the proposals have merit. if children are the source for future sucess of our society they must be nurtured as best we can based upon available knowledge However, since the family is the basis of our society family values must be taken into account; not some collective ideas. I like the given and take of this exhibit but wish there was a way of interchange with other past views.
cool
very wrong
very cool
i think this is exactly what the world should focus on.
it is a amazing idea
Even though this is very important, it isn't the most IMPORTANT thing we need to focus on. I'm sure there are poeple that would disagree with me! But I think this should be brought up after we get outof national debt, gettng our soldiers home, anything else but this
I believe most children in the world should be brought up with a jubilant childhood and should be diligent with the help of their parents.
This is push polling. An atempt to influence opinion under the guise of asking for opinions.
couldn`t agree more!
Government and society should not be relied upon to raise our children
This is definitely polling with the intent of skewing the outcome.
Stay home with your babies! Only have one car. Stay married. Drop the cell phone plan. Drop cable. Raising children on 1 income is affordable, but sacrafices must be made. Don't have children if YOU don't intend to care for them.
the proposals have ups and down to each situation, pros and cons, bad and good thoughts. i guess its just some thing for voting and personal choices. actually strike that, voting stinks for the population most of the time, just a personal decision
is honest opinion a mind reader? cause it seems that way:)
The idea that parents are the most important resource in a child's 1st five years of development will hopefully lead more parents to not be ashamed to stay home and raise their own children rather than commit this important task to day care and pre-school providers!
i think that babies are most preous gift for any woman
family support, community involvement and public programs are all important parts of raising children today for the best possible outcome.
The options are very skewed for funding purposes. I am disappointed with the options.
Considering we're the people who get robbed when your child turns out wrong it's more efficient to just give that support early on.
why do people post things like "i agree" or "i disagree"... its obvious u think that by how u answered the survey the point posting things is to elaborate on ur opinion not just restating it.. just saying...
all that was suggested hear would be worth trying. statistics can be figured out later.
Awsome idea, i think i will do that when i get older.
no school erly to make liveing fun
100% of kids should not go to school = midle\high and beond
This comment is surely an indication that education is valuable!
This entire show describes families incapable and under-educated to the task of raising children. It espouses the solution of more state power and moneys to be brought into play. We are all well familiar with this model. Higher taxes, less personal freedom and power over one's own life. Will we ever let go of this teary sentiment for failed socialist programs. Wake up, put the pipe down, (or whatever hypnotic you are ingesting).
The firs proposal suggests that parents being the first teachers and community organizations and government agencies taking an interest in their lives are mutually exclusive, or at least conflicting notions. I disagree...
i think most of the suggested contribution are very good to help all families and advocates for childrens health. however there may be more ideas out there to tap into.
interesting it can work but like other things it may end up failing
hello
this greay way of achieving goals for positive and effective parenting and invite participation from potential parents.
My grandson attends a preschool where he is taught by attentive and knowledgeable teachers. I am always learning someting from them about childhood behavior and development. Why not combine the 3 scenarios so that knowledge like this can be regularly shared between family and community?
How lovely to have something so interactive; very valuable. I write as a married mother of two and someone whose brain was possibly affected in a car accident 21 years ago. I really agree with what you are aiming to do.
As a socity we strugle with this issue. The polics are thick and the children suffer. I agree it starts with the parents and if other pre-school programs were affordable that would help aid parents.
Post new comment